The Official Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS)
Table 5 Average annual impact of TPP and TTIP on sugar consumption in % terms (2015–2030)
From: Mega-regional trade Agreements: Costly distractions for developing countries?
Region | TPP | TTIP | Services NTBs | Labour standards | Environmental standards | IP rules | Improved access | Productivity effects | Total effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tariffs | Tariffs | ||||||||
Japan | − 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
China | − 0.3 | − 0.3 | − 0.3 | − 0.8 | − 0.3 | − 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | − 1.5 |
Korea | − 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.7 |
Taiwan | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | 0 | − 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | − 0.1 | − 0.4 |
Singapore | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | − 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 |
Indonesia | − 0.2 | − 0.1 | − 0.2 | − 0.6 | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | − 0.9 |
Malaysia | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | − 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.2 |
Philippines | − 0.2 | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | − 0.5 | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | − 0.8 |
Thailand | − 0.3 | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | − 0.2 | − 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | − 0.4 |
Vietnam | 0.3 | 0 | 0.1 | − 0.8 | 0 | 0 | − 0.1 | 0.3 | − 0.2 |
Rest of ASEAN | 0 | 0 | − 0.1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
India | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | − 0.9 | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | − 1 |
Australia | 1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 2 |
New Zealand | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.9 |
USA | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 1.1 |
Canada | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 1.1 |
Mexico | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | − 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Chile | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
Peru | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | − 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.9 |
Russia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
EU28 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.5 |
ROW | 0.2 | 0.0 | − 0.1 | − 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
Average | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | − 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 |