The Official Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS)
Table 11 Aberrant KC indicators summed by province
From: How to evaluate the reliability of regional input–output data? A case for China
2002–2007 | 2007–2012 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mutation | Trend | Suma | Mutation | Trend | Sum | |
Beijing | 1 | 11 | 12 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Tianjin | 1 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
Hebei | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Shanxi | 0 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 11 |
Neimenggu | 3 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Liaoning | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Jilin | 3 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Heilongjiang | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Shanghai | 7 | 7 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Jiangsu | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Zhejiang | 2 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Anhui | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Fujian | 5 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
Jiangxi | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Shandong | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Henan | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Hubei | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Hunan | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Guangdong | 3 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Guangxi | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Hainan | 5 | 12 | 16 | 5 | 14 | 18 |
Chongqing | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Sichuan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Guizhou | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Yunnan | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Shaanxi | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
Gansu | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
Qinghai | 13 | 11 | 22 | 4 | 17 | 20 |
Ningxia | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
Xinjiang | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 7 |
Nation total | 66 | 150 | 209 | 52 | 145 | 194 |