The Official Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS)
From: How to evaluate the reliability of regional input–output data? A case for China
Best data quality, 1–5 | Worst data quality, 1–5 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Province | Aberrant KCsa | Rank | Province | aberrant KCs |
Period 2002–2007 | Period 2002–2007 | ||||
1 | Sichuan | 0.000 | 1 | Qinghai | 0.253 |
2 | Hebei | 0.023 | 2 | Hainan | 0.184 |
2 | Heilongjiang | 0.023 | 3 | Shanghai | 0.149 |
2 | Hubei | 0.023 | 4 | Beijing | 0.138 |
2 | Hunan | 0.023 | 5 | Guangdong | 0.126 |
Period 2007–2012 | Period 2007–2012 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hunan | 0.011 | 1 | Qinghai | 0.230 |
1 | Liaoning | 0.011 | 2 | Hainan | 0.207 |
2 | Sichuan | 0.023 | 3 | Beijing | 0.149 |
2 | Guangxi | 0.023 | 4 | Shanxi | 0.126 |
2 | Jiangsu | 0.023 | 4 | Ningxia | 0.126 |