Skip to main content

The Official Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS)

Table 6 Best and worst IO data quality regarding province in each period

From: How to evaluate the reliability of regional input–output data? A case for China

Best data quality, 1–5

Worst data quality, 1–5

Rank

Province

Aberrant KCsa

Rank

Province

aberrant KCs

Period 2002–2007

Period 2002–2007

1

Sichuan

0.000

1

Qinghai

0.253

2

Hebei

0.023

2

Hainan

0.184

2

Heilongjiang

0.023

3

Shanghai

0.149

2

Hubei

0.023

4

Beijing

0.138

2

Hunan

0.023

5

Guangdong

0.126

Period 2007–2012

Period 2007–2012

1

Hunan

0.011

1

Qinghai

0.230

1

Liaoning

0.011

2

Hainan

0.207

2

Sichuan

0.023

3

Beijing

0.149

2

Guangxi

0.023

4

Shanxi

0.126

2

Jiangsu

0.023

4

Ningxia

0.126

  1. aAberrant KCs mean the ratio of aberrant KCs to all KCs, lower is better