Skip to main content

The Official Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS)

Table 2 Annual cumulative increase and decrease in expenditure and ripple effects

From: The damage and reconstruction of the Kumamoto earthquake: an analysis on the impact of changes in expenditures with multi-regional input–output table for Kumamoto Prefecture

Region

Stage

(billion yen)

Annual cumulative

Net change

Increase

Decrease

Kumamoto Prefecture

Expenditure

648

− 592

56

Domestic total demand

487

− 425

62

Induced production

648

− 553

94

Induced value-added

375

− 348

27

 Kumamoto City

Expenditure

230

− 185

45

Domestic total demand

182

− 167

15

Induced production

253

− 230

23

Induced value-added

153

− 152

1

 Northern prefecture

Expenditure

246

− 297

− 51

Domestic total demand

179

− 183

− 4

Induced production

232

− 226

5

Induced value-added

130

− 136

− 5

 Southern prefecture

Expenditure

171

− 110

62

Domestic total demand

127

− 75

51

Induced production

163

− 98

66

Induced value-added

92

− 61

31

Outside the prefecture

Expenditure

0

0

0

Domestic total demand

121

− 118

4

Induced production

406

− 326

81

Induced value-added

181

− 153

28

  1. The values for the annual cumulative total are the sum of the estimated for the amounts of increases or decreases by industry, item, and month in each stage and region. The annual cumulative increase and decrease in expenditure is the sum of \({\Sigma }_{k}{\Sigma }_{m}\boldsymbol{\Delta }{{\varvec{F}}}_{{\varvec{m}}}^{{\varvec{k}}\cdot{\varvec{l}}}\) by region. The annual cumulative increase and decrease in ripple effect is the sum of \({\Sigma }_{k}{\Sigma }_{m}\boldsymbol{\Delta }{{\varvec{X}}}_{{\varvec{m}}}^{{\varvec{k}}\cdot{\varvec{l}}}, {\Sigma }_{k}{\Sigma }_{m}\boldsymbol{\Delta }{{\varvec{V}}}_{{\varvec{m}}}^{{\varvec{k}}\cdot{\varvec{l}}}\) by region. The domestic total demand is the sum of \({\Sigma }_{k}{\Sigma }_{m}\left({\varvec{T}}-\widehat{{\varvec{M}}}{{\varvec{T}}}_{{\varvec{L}}}\right)\boldsymbol{\Delta }{{\varvec{F}}}_{{\varvec{m}}}^{{\varvec{k}}\cdot{\varvec{l}}}\) by region in the analytical model (7). However, tourism consumption is separately multiplied by the adjusted self-sufficiency rate. In addition, regional households consumption distributed by \(\left({\varvec{T}}-\widehat{{\varvec{M}}}{{\varvec{T}}}_{{\varvec{L}}}\right)\) include tourism consumption, so some of the consumption of the two overlaps. Regarding these, household consumption may have been overestimated, because it is deemed difficult to make adjustments due to various constraints