Skip to main content

The Official Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS)

Table 8 VECM Granger causality results

From: Revisiting the electricity consumption-led growth hypothesis: is the rule defied in France?

Dependent variable

Type of causality

Short run

Long run

\(\sum \Delta \ln Y_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln EC_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln F_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln K_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln TO_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln TO_{t - 1}\)

\(\Delta \ln Y_{t}\)

–

7.3639***

[0.0024]

0.8278

[0.4464]

4.4349**

[0.0202]

16.2868*

[0.0000]

− 0.1631*

[− 4.4861]

\(\Delta \ln EC_{t}\)

0.7126

[0.4984]

–

0.1330

[0.8419]

0.0207

[0.9795]

0.4322

[0.6530]

− 0.5961

[− 4.5928]

\(\Delta \ln F_{t}\)

2.5007***

[0.0909]

0.5639

[0.5749]

–

0.0633

[0.9388]

2.0707

[0.1433]

− 0.8204*

[− 3.2507]

\(\Delta \ln K_{t}\)

10.3237*

[0.0004]

0.8177

[0.4510]

0.1896

[0.8283]

–

0.8246

[0.4481]

− 0.2657*

[− 3.3544]

\(\Delta \ln TO_{t}\)

16.2790*

[0.0000]

1.4137

[0.2585]

2.0118

[0.1510]

0.3139

[0.7328]

–

–

 

\(\sum \Delta \ln Y_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln EC_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln F_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln K_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln EX_{t - 1}\)

\(ECT_{t - 1}\)

\(\Delta \ln Y_{t}\)

–

4.1745**

[0.0251]

1.1672

[0.3250]

17.5632*

[0.0000]

10.7514*

[0.0003]

− 0.3347***

[− 1.9763]

\(\Delta \ln EC_{t}\)

1.6781*

[0.0000]

–

0.0934

[0.9111]

0.2128

[0.8095]

0.1472

[0.8637]

− 0.4838**

[− 2.4603]

\(\Delta \ln F_{t}\)

0.1297

[0.8686]

0.5753

[0.5686]

–

0.0074

[0.9926]

0.2079

[0.8134]

− 1.0004*

[− 3.9696]

\(\Delta \ln K_{t}\)

27.4559*

[0.0000]

1.5326

[0.2324]

0.0363

[0.9648]

–

0.6268

[0.5411]

− 0.2917**

[− 2.7502]

\(\Delta \ln EX_{t}\)

12.2242*

[0.0001]

1.2976

[0.2876]

0.6280

[0.5403]

0.9417

[0.4008]

–

–

 

\(\sum \Delta \ln Y_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln EC_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln F_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln K_{t - 1}\)

\(\sum \Delta \ln IM_{t - 1}\)

\(ECT_{t - 1}\)

\(\Delta \ln Y_{t}\)

–

5.0905**

[0.0123]

4.5044**

[0.0192]

3.9775**

[0.0290]

15.8681*

[0.0000]

− 0.2305***

[− 1.8153]

\(\Delta \ln EC_{t}\)

1.0110

[0.3759]

–

0.3736

[0.5914]

0.0928

[0.9116]

0.5965

[0.5571]

− 0.5087*

[− 4.2218]

\(\Delta \ln F_{t}\)

7.7339**

[0.0348]

0.1253

[0.8826]

–

0.7382

[0.4865]

2.0005

[0.1529]

− 0.6617*

[− 3.0982]

\(\Delta \ln K_{t}\)

2.5232***

[0.0971]

1.1841

[0.3199]

1.9641

[0.1579]

–

1.9382

[0.1616]

− 0.2164**

[− 2.7020]

\(\Delta \ln IM_{t}\)

9.3251*

[0.0007]

0.6030

[0.5530]

16.2080*

[0.0000]

7.0109*

[0.0031]

–

–

  1. *, ** and *** indicate the level of significance at 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively