Skip to main content

The Official Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS)

Table 6 Granger causality test

From: Does the country’s political and economic risks trigger risk-taking behavior in the banking sector: a new insight from regional study

Null Hypothesis

F-statistics

[Prob. value]

Causality

Capital regulation

 → 

Banking risk‐taking

2.381**

[0.023]

Yes

Credit risk

 → 

Banking risk‐taking

5.424***

[0.000]

Yes

Inefficiency

 → 

Banking risk‐taking

4.446***

[0.000]

Yes

Market power

 → 

Banking risk‐taking

2.345**

[0.021]

Yes

Income divarication

 → 

Banking risk‐taking

5.135***

[0.001]

Yes

Financial development

 → 

Banking risk‐taking

4.354***

[0.000]

Yes

Deposit insurance

 → 

Banking risk‐taking

5.112***

[0.001]

Yes

Political risk

 → 

Banking risk‐taking

2.425**

[0.021]

Yes

Economic risk

 → 

Banking risk‐taking

4.216***

[0.001]

Yes

  1. The symbols *, ** and *** indicate statistical significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively